GIGABALL

For most of its history, trading was a private act. You read something, you formed a view, you placed the order, and nobody knew unless you told them. That is no longer how most people trade, and the numbers say so plainly. Social and copy-trading platforms are now a multi-billion-dollar category with more than eleven million active copy-traders; the largest of them counts its registered users in the tens of millions and lets any of them mirror another account’s trades with one tap. The new mobile-first apps go further and make the feed the whole product: what the traders you follow just bought, next to a leaderboard, next to a buy button.

The memecoin terminals arrived at the same place from the other direction. They began as speed tools, built to see the new pair first and buy it in one click, and have spent the last year adding people. Wallet tracking, so you can watch what a known address does. Top-callers leaderboards. And, in the spring of this year, callouts: a feed in which a wallet publicly names a coin, optionally with a thesis and a linked identity, and the people following that wallet see it the moment it is posted. By the autumn the same terminal was drawing callout markers directly on the price chart, and had opened an API so that partners could publish and read callouts programmatically.

That is the whole shift in one sentence: the trade now begins with a person, not a chart. The thing being distributed is not information about the coin but conviction about it, signed by somebody whose record you can inspect. Call it social trading, call it FOMO with a product attached. It is mainstream, it is where the volume comes from, and any coin launched today is launched into it.

A callout is a public statement, by a named wallet, that it is backing a specific coin. It is timestamped, it is attributable, and it is visible to everybody who follows the caller at the moment it is made. It differs from a tweet in that the terminal knows which coin it refers to, and differs from a trade in that it is meant to be seen.

Three things happen when one lands. Followers buy, because that is what following is for. Volume spikes, because the buying is concentrated in the minutes after the post. And the fee stream on the coin jumps with it, because a launchpad charges a fee on every trade and pays a share of it to whoever launched the coin. The callout is therefore not just attention. It is attention that arrives with money attached, at a known moment, from a known source.

What it does not do, on almost every coin in existence, is change the coin. The spike comes and goes. The fees are collected by the creator and spent somewhere the chart never sees. The supply the market is trading against is exactly what it was before the callout, so a coin that is called out a hundred times in a day ends that day as the same object it started as. Every one of those hundred moments was an input the coin simply discarded.

GIGABALL closes that loop and nothing else. It is a coin whose one behaviour is a reaction to being called out. Trading pays a creator fee into the launch wallet as it happens; when the coin is called out, everything that has arrived in that wallet is spent buying the coin on the open market, and everything bought is sent to the burn address in the same block. Then it waits for the next callout.

Take the name seriously for a paragraph. A ball rolling downhill gets bigger by moving: every turn picks up what it rolls over and adds it to the mass, so the next turn picks up more. Stop pushing it and it stops growing, and nothing about that is a promise. Here the push is a callout and the mass is what has been burned. Each callout removes float; the next callout’s buying lands on a smaller float than the last; and the burn that follows removes a share of a supply that is already smaller. The same amount of attention does more each time around.

There are exactly two ways to hand a coin’s fees back to the coin. Pay them out to holders, which makes the coin a distribution and turns every holder into a recipient with an opinion about the rate. Or spend them buying the coin and destroy what you bought, which makes the coin an instrument whose float only ever contracts. GIGABALL is the second one, on the argument that a burn is the only version of this that nobody can undo: a treasury can be sold, a distribution can be stopped, but a token that has been sent to the burn address is not coming back.

$GIGABALL lives on a flap.sh bonding curve on BNB Smart Chain. One call to the Portal, 0xe2cE6ab80874Fa9Fa2aAE65D277Dd6B8e65C9De0, deploys the token and its curve together and mints the entire billion-token supply into the curve in the same transaction. Nothing is held back: no team allocation, no pre-launch reserve, no vesting schedule with our name on it. The curve trades against BNB until four fifths of the supply has been bought from it, and then the remaining fifth and the whole reserve move into a PancakeSwap V3 pool.

Two things follow that are worth stating precisely rather than gesturing at.

The supply is a billion, fixed at launch, and the site quotes it from the token itself. What the burn does not do is reduce totalSupply(): a flap launch token is a plain ERC-20 with no burn instruction, so supply leaves by being sent to 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD, an address nobody holds the key to. Every figure on this page is therefore the float: total supply less that address’s balance, both of them single reads that anyone can repeat.

The fee destination is fixed at creation and needs no claiming. flap records the launching wallet as the coin’s creator and pays the creator share of its 3% trading fee into that wallet automatically, trade by trade, for the life of the coin. So the wallet’s balance is the fee stream, and a block has nothing to collect, only something to spend.

A buyback and a burn are usually spoken of together and they are not the same act. The buyback is the market operation: fees, converted into bids, executed against whatever the curve or the pool is offering. The burn is what happens to the inventory afterwards, and it is the only part that is irreversible.

Hold the tokens instead and you have a treasury. A treasury is a promise wearing the costume of an asset: it can be sold, lent, used as collateral, or quietly moved, and every holder is therefore carrying an unpriced option written by whoever holds the key. Burn them and the option does not exist. The float is smaller, and the key that performed the burn has no more power over the outcome than anybody else’s.

The order matters too, and it is the reason this is a buyback and not a fee burn. The fees arrive as BNB. Burning BNB would destroy value belonging to nobody in particular; spending it on the coin first means the money is exerted as demand, a real bid, filled at whatever the market asks, at the exact moment a callout has the most eyes on the chart, and only then removed from the supply. Every burn on this page is therefore two effects rather than one: a purchase that had to be filled, and a float that is permanently smaller afterwards.

Three steps, in order, each a separate transaction signed by the same key: the wallet the coin was launched from, which flap recorded as the creator and which is therefore the only wallet the fees are ever paid to.

1. Callout. Somebody calls the coin out. That is the whole trigger, and it is recorded on every block so a reader can see what set it off.
2. Buy. 100% of what the wallet holds, the creator fees that trading has paid in since the last block less a small reserve for gas, buys $GIGABALL: from the curve before graduation, through the PancakeSwap router after it, bounded at 3% slippage. All of it rather than a share, deliberately: a callout is the event the coin exists to answer, and the whole balance is the answer.
3. Burn. Every token the wallet holds is sent to the burn address, not merely what this block bought. A block that buys and then fails before burning would otherwise leave tokens in the wallet, and the wallet holding its own supply is the single thing this design exists to avoid.

The sequencing is deliberate on the last point. Burning the balance rather than the purchase makes the step idempotent: whatever is there goes, so a failure anywhere upstream costs a block rather than stranding inventory, and the invariant a reader cares about, that the wallet ends every successful block holding none of the coin, is checkable from outside on any block. Blocks never overlap, because two settlements racing for the same wallet balance would each be built against a number the other was about to change; a callout that arrives mid-block is recorded as waiting, and the next block spends what both earned.

A block below the floor is recorded too. A callout against no volume finds a wallet holding nothing but its gas reserve, buys nothing, burns nothing, and is listed above as waiting with the reason. That is the protocol behaving correctly rather than an error, and it is the honest answer to the obvious objection: a thousand callouts against no trading claim nothing. Attention does not fund the burn. Attention that people act on does, and the callout is simply when the protocol looks.

flap fixes the fee destination and the venue executes the buy. Neither is ours. The cycle in §6 is: a process watches for callouts, runs the block, and holds the key to the launch wallet.

That key cannot mint: the supply was fixed in the launch transaction and this protocol has no call that adds to it. It cannot freeze a holder or claw back a transfer, because the token is a plain ERC-20 with no such function. It cannot unburn anything, which is what makes every block that has already run permanent regardless of what happens to this one.

What it can do is stop, or buy and not burn. Read the propositions as describing the protocol rather than the operator. Every burn already on the chain is irreversible and listed above; every burn that has not happened yet is somebody’s intention. Until the wallet is owned by a contract whose only behaviour is buy and burn, that distinction is the entire risk, and this page will not soften it.

Notes

1. Callouts as a product: GMGN shipped them in its V3.0 app in May 2026 as a feed of public calls from tracked wallets and KOLs, added callout markers to its charts in September 2026, and publishes a Callout OpenAPI for partners to post and read them. Copy-trading figures are from the industry’s own 2026 reporting; the point is the order of magnitude, not the decimal.
2. flap charges 3% on every trade against the curve, of which the creator leg is one part, paid to the launch wallet automatically. Every figure here quotes the creator leg only, which is what this protocol actually receives, never the total a trade pays. After graduation the curve fee no longer applies and the creator share comes from the PancakeSwap pool’s own fees. The Portal is 0xe2cE6ab80874Fa9Fa2aAE65D277Dd6B8e65C9De0.
3. Burned on the masthead is read from the burn address on every poll rather than computed from our own record: the address counts everything anybody has ever burned, which is the honest answer to how much of this coin is gone. The ledger’s own figure, what this protocol burned, is the one the chart is drawn from, and the two can only differ by what somebody else destroyed.
4. Every parameter quoted in this prose is imported from the module the buyback reads, so the document cannot drift from the process it describes.